what if . . .

Emergency Rule Declared, Constitution Suspended.

The President defended his actions in a national address, saying he was curbing a rise in extremism. The Chief Justice has been replaced. The Supreme Court has been surrounded by troops- as have public radio and television stations. The moves come as the Supreme Court was due to rule on the legality of the president's election victories.

"Extremists are roaming around freely in the country, and they are not scared of law-enforcement agencies," the president said.

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the declaration of emergency rule was "highly regrettable."

The political and judicial core has been shut down, but the rest of the country is functioning normally.

The main target is the judiciary which is accused of interfering in government policy-- and weakening the struggle against terrorism.

The Chief Justice and eight other judges refused to endorse the emergency order, declaring it unconstitutional.

A new chief justice has been appointed.

what if . . .

If Iraq hadn't happened?

Tim Watkin asks "How would the world and the U.S. be different if there had been no invasion in 2003?"




resistance

The best way to support the troops is to give them accurate information and the tools to refuse to serve.
- glassfrequency

GI RIGHTS HOTLINE:

1-800-394-9544

1-877-447-4487



Help for servicemembers

The GI Rights Hotline assists thousands of servicemembers every year who have gone AWOL or UA. We keep up-to-date information on each Service's AWOL and UA policies, provided to AWOL or UA clients in a confidential setting.

For more information, email or call:

1-800-394-9544

1-877-447-4487

Hitler & Chamberlain & 1938 (again)

from Tony Karon [excerpts]

Fareed Zakaria deserves a medal for breaking with the mainstream media pack to slap down, with the requisite rudeness, the hysteria over Iran being manufactured by the neocons, opportunist Israeli politicians and the Bush Administration. Perhaps stung by having participated in a secret Bush Administration policy discussion to help shape the Iraq war policy before the invasion, Zakaria is acting with honor now to prevent another disaster.
- - - - -
In an outstanding column in Newsweek two weeks ago, Zakaria did what few mainstream media figures are prepared to do when the President glibly tells Americans that the sky will fall unless they do his bidding — eschewing the deference that so often characterizes the media corps’ approach to the Bush Administration, Zakaria leaves his readers in no doubt that he thinks the President of the United States is a bullshitter, and a dangerous one at that. To quote:


At a meeting with reporters last week, President Bush said that “if you’re interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing [Iran] from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon.” These were not the barbs of some neoconservative crank or sidelined politician looking for publicity. This was the president of the United States, invoking the specter of World War III if Iran gained even the knowledge needed to make a nuclear weapon.

The American discussion about Iran has lost all connection to reality. Norman Podhoretz, the neoconservative ideologist whom Bush has consulted on this topic, has written that Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is “like Hitler … a revolutionary whose objective is to overturn the going international system and to replace it in the fullness of time with a new order dominated by Iran and ruled by the religio-political culture of Islamofascism.” For this staggering proposition Podhoretz provides not a scintilla of evidence.

Here is the reality. Iran has an economy the size of Finland’s and an annual defense budget of around $4.8 billion. It has not invaded a country since the late 18th century. The United States has a GDP that is 68 times larger and defense expenditures that are 110 times greater. Israel and every Arab country (except Syria and Iraq) are quietly or actively allied against Iran. And yet we are to believe that Tehran is about to overturn the international system and replace it with an Islamo-fascist order? What planet are we on?


. . . assume for a moment Iran did actually use its nuclear energy infrastructure to build a weapon — which it could potentially do, although it would probably take more than five years from now — even then, is Iran really a doomsday threat?

Zakaria has systematically demolished the claims by the war lobby that Iran is beyond negotiation and deterrence, because it is somehow driven by nutty apocalyptic religious zeal, and pointed out that it is the U.S. that has actually refused to negotiate when the Iranians have made decent offers . . .


MORE:

Rootless Cosmopolitan - Give Fareed Zakaria a Medal!


Newsweek - Stalin, Mao And … Ahmadinejad?

photo source


445 days to go

Elliot Cohen writes:

According to the EFF, the secret rooms created under the supervision of the NSA contain “powerful computer equipment connected to separate networks. This equipment is designed to analyze communications at high speed, and can be programmed to review and select out the contents and traffic patterns of communications according to user-defined rules” [emphasis added].

In the absence of judicial oversight, there is no way of knowing what the system’s predefined definitions are.

Therefore, it is not possible to discern who else the government may be targeting with neither warrant nor probable cause—perhaps lawbreakers such as drug traffickers, Internet predators and money launderers; but targets might just as well include investigative journalists, political opponents and other persons deemed hostile to the Bush administration.

It is also difficult or impossible to tell, without judicial oversight, how the Bush administration might use this information.


MORE from Truthdig - America is Watching You

photo source